By JESSE LIEBMAN
Any time an award or some form of recognition is handed out, it will no doubt inspire agreement, discussion, discourse and debate.
So it should be no surprise that this season’s NHL awards will see its fare share of applause and criticism.
Of note was the announcement from the league on Wednesday that Sergei Bobrovsky, Henrik Lundqvist and Antti Niemi are the finalists for the Vezina Trophy, recognizing “the goalkeeper adjudged to be the best at his position.”
Aside from the historical significance of this year’s Vezina crop (this is the first time that all three finalists were born and trained in Europe, a commentary on the international growth of the NHL), there’s plenty of intrigue surrounding the announcement of the winner.
Will Lundqvist take home his second straight? Will Bobrovsky emerge as the victor in spite of his team missing the playoffs? Could Niemi possibly steal some votes for his stellar play down the stretch? And how on earth did the Bruins’ Tuukka Rask fail to make the cut?
These are all valid questions to ponder, but they aren’t the focus of this piece.
I have always viewed the Vezina Trophy with a curious fascination; not because of who has received it, but rather how a decision on the recipient is determined each year.
Of the major NHL hardware handed out at the conclusion of the season, the Vezina is a unique specimen. Read the full post »


